Asụsụ Rung

Asụsụ Rung bụ ngalaba a tụrụ aro maka asụsụ Sino-Tibet . Randy LaPolla tụpụtara alaka ahụ na ndabere nke morphological akaebe dị ka pronominal paradigms. Otú ọ dị, Guillaume Jacques na Thomas Pellard (2021) na-arụ ụka na asụsụ ndị a emeghị ka ọ bụrụ otu n'ime ihe ọmụmụ phylogenetic na nso nso a ^[1] ^[2] na nyocha nke ọma nke ihe ọhụrụ na-ekerịta lexical . ^[3]

LaPolla (2003) depụtara asụsụ ndị a dịka akụkụ nke otu "Rung" nwa oge ya.

Kham, Magar, na Chepangic ka akwadokwara ka ha bụrụ akụkụ nke otu nnukwu Magaric .

Ntụaka

ndabere nke morphological akaebe dị ka pronominal paradigms. Otú

↑ Sagart (2019-05-21). "Dated language phylogenies shed light on the ancestry of Sino-Tibetan" (in en). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116 (21): 10317–10322. DOI:10.1073/pnas.1817972116. ISSN 0027-8424. PMID 31061123.
↑ Zhang (2020). "Dated phylogeny suggests early Neolithic origin of Sino-Tibetan languages" (in en). Scientific Reports 10 (1): 20792. DOI:10.1038/s41598-020-77404-4. ISSN 2045-2322. PMID 33247154.
↑ Jacques (2021-02-03). "Phylogenies based on lexical innovations refute the Rung hypothesis" (in en). Diachronica 38 (1): 1–24. DOI:10.1075/dia.19058.jac. ISSN 0176-4225.

[1] Sagart (2019-05-21). "Dated language phylogenies shed light on the ancestry of Sino-Tibetan" (in en). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116 (21): 10317–10322. DOI:10.1073/pnas.1817972116. ISSN 0027-8424. PMID 31061123.

[2] Zhang (2020). "Dated phylogeny suggests early Neolithic origin of Sino-Tibetan languages" (in en). Scientific Reports 10 (1): 20792. DOI:10.1038/s41598-020-77404-4. ISSN 2045-2322. PMID 33247154.

[3] Jacques (2021-02-03). "Phylogenies based on lexical innovations refute the Rung hypothesis" (in en). Diachronica 38 (1): 1–24. DOI:10.1075/dia.19058.jac. ISSN 0176-4225.

[1]

[2]

[3]