Zadok

Zadok, sụkwara Sadok, Sadok, [1] Zadok, Tzadok ma ọ bụ Tsadok ( Hebrew </link> ; ọkụ. 'onye ezi omume, onye ezi omume'), bụ Kohen (onye ndụ), nke e dekọrọ na Bible dị. ka onye sitere n'eriri Eleeza nwa Eron . [2] Ọ bụ Onyeisi Nchụàjà nke Izrel n’oge Devid na ụmụ . [3] O ụdị Eze Devid aka n’oge nnupụisi nke nwa ya nwoke bụ Absalọm, bụ́ nke nna nye aka n’iweta Solomọn n’ocheeze ma chịkwaa ya n’ochichi Solomọn. Mgbe Sọlọmọn wuchara ndị nsọ nke Mbụ na Jerusalem, Zadọk bụ Onyeisi Nchụàjà jere ozi n’ebe ahụ mbụ ozi n’ebe ahụ.

Ezikiel onye meta toro ụmụ Zadọk otuto dị ka ndị na-nnan arụsị siri ike n'oge a na-efe ndị ọgọ nta, ma gosi ọnọdụ ọkpara ha n'ihi ọrụ na ihe ndị ọzọ iche ha ga-arụ n'ahụ nsso. n'etiti.

Akwụkwọ Nsọ Hibru

Tanakh (Bible Hibru) na-ekwu na Zadọk bụ onye si n’eriri Eleeza nwa Eron bụ nnukwu onye nchekwa . [1] E were osuso-ọmumu Zedok n’ihi-osuso-ọmumu Ezra (nwa ya) dika ọb unu nke iteghete nke sitere na Finehas nwa Eleeza.

Ma otu Zedok bu otu nime ndi nēso Devid nime Hebron, o we nye ya okpu-eze Israel nile, na ulo-ya, tiyere ndi-isi orú na abua. [1] Josephus ndị Zadọk a na nnukwu onye ike nke otu aha ahụ. ^[1]

N'oge nnupụisi nke Absalọm, e kpọkpọrọ Zadọk onye nchekwa aha, ebe ya na ndị Livaị mmetụta iso Devid na-agba ọsọ gaa bugo Igbe ndò ndụ ahụ, ma eze gwara Zadọk ka ọ na-eta na Jerusalem, bụ ebe ya na Abayata ga- eme ya nke ọma obodo. O [1], na Ahimaaz nwa Zedok, na Jonatan nwa Abaiata, wetara eze ahu nke nāb unualaga ozi nke nēweta ndu. [2] N’ihe odide ndị a nile, e kpọrọ Zadọk aha n’ihu Abiata. [3] Zedok bu kwa onye-isi nke ndi Eron. [4] Ejighị okwu ahụ bụ onye isi nchụaja mee ihe n’akwụkwọ nsso Hibru n’oge Jọshịa ruo n’ịkọ Joash.

Ma Zedọk na Abaiata jere ozi n’otu n’otu dị ka ndị ndu n’oge Devid ji ọsọ na Jerusalem. Na mbụ Devid hiwere ndị òtù ya, e kpọrọm Zadọk na Abayata nwa Ahimelek ka ha bụrụ ndị eze. [1] N’ịbụ ndị e gbuchiri nnupụisi nke Absalọm, Eze zipụrụ Zadọk na Abayata ka ha gakwuru ndị okenye Juda, gwa ha ka ha mee ngwa ngwa ịhụte eze ahụ. [2] E sere, mgbe Adonaịja gbasiri ike ejide ocheeze ahụ, Abaiata akwadoro ya, duru Eze Sọlọmọn (nwa Devid) ịchụpụ ya na Jerusalem ma mee ka otu isi-isi-nchụaja nke Zedọk dị ike, bụ onye ya na Netan onye. Nna nna nna Eze Sọlọmọn. ocheeze. [3] N'obi ekele, Solomọn mgbaàmà ya nanị onye isi ike. [4] Zadọk we je ozi n'ememe nke otite-manu Solomon dika eze

Na 1 Iphe e meru 16:39 A mbụ Zadọk aha dị ka onye ndú nke ndị mụrụ bụ́ ndị na-eje ozi “n'ihu ngo Jehova n'ebe dị elu nke dị na Gibeon ," n'agbanyeghị na e ịhụnanya dekọọ ya dị ka. ya na Ahimelek na-arụkọ ọrụ, na-echepụta usoro nke ozi onye njikwa. kwadoo Nkwado Devid maka owuwu nke ụlọ ndo dị na Jerusalem

Ụmụ Zadọk bụ Ahimaz na Azaraịa . Ụmụ ya ndị ji ọkwa nchụ-aja mgbe e bibiri Ndị Nsọ nke Mbụ na, mgbe e wuchara ụlọ nsbọ nke abụọ, iche iche n'ọkwa onye isi nchụ-aja, dịka Jọshụa Onyeisi Nchụàjà (ya na Ezra ) sitere n'agbụrụ ndị Sadọk.

Ndị eze Zadọkaịt

N'akwụkwọ ndị rabaị

Dị ka Bible si kwuo, Erọn achụ ndụ ndụ na- adịru mgbe ndepụta ebi ụmụ ya, na nanị ụmụ ya, ga-abụ ndị nta

Dị ka ụfọdụ si kwuo, ọ bụ nanị ụmụ Eleeza nwa Erọn ka e ịhụ ka ndị mụrụ ndị Eleeza bụ́buru ketara uwe ndị nke Erọn ( Ọnụ Ọgụgụ 20:24–28 ), [1] ma bụrụkwa nke a kpaara ókè nye ụmụ Pinchas. nwa Eleeza mgbe Pinchas rụpụtara ọrụ ọkụ ọkụ n'obi ya

Otú ọ dị, mgbe e ịhụ, ọ bụ Ilaị, onye sitere n'eriri Itamar (nwanne Eleeza) n'chiri ọkwa onye isi. Ndị na-enweta Torah na-ekwu na nke a bụ ndidi Pinchas mechara. [1] Ma n'elu nmehie nke umu Ilai, Hofnai na Finehas, bú onye nke Chineke, buru amuma ngwusi nke ọlu-nchu-àjà-ha.: Amụma a mezuru mgbe a họpụtara Zedọk, onye si n’eriri Eleeza na Pinchas, dị ka nnukwu onye nchụàjà. ^[2] ^[3]

Akụkọ banyere ndị Zadọk

Ihe dị iche nke ihe mere eme na-egosi na ɔkwan nchụ-aja ahụ ihe na-abụ n’ụmụ Zedok asụsụ n’oge Zedọk ruo n’oge mbilite n’ọnwụ nke ndị Hasmon, n’ihe dị ka 167 TOA. [1] Ụmụ Zadọk mụbara n'ọkwa na ikike, nke mere na nwa ya nwoke bụ Azaraya bụ otu n'ime ndị isi Sịlmụ ụmụ ( 1 Ndị Eze 4:2 ) na Ahimaz, bụ onye ndụ ada Sọlọmọn, bụ onye ọzọ n'ime. ụmụ ndị ikom Zedọk ( 1 Ndị Eze 4:15 ). MA ZADE N'AKA NA NWA NWA Ọ bụ NWA na-Ihe NKEJE NWAM NWAM. nke Zadọk mbụ ( 2 Ndị Eze 15:33 ; 2 Ihe E Mere 27:1 ).

Ndị nke Zadọk nwere nnukwu ọkwa nchụ-aja site n'ọtụtụ oge nke ndị nsọ nke ndị, site na Jehoshua ben Jehozadak mgbe a dọọrọ n'agha laa, gbadaruo Saịmọn nke amaghị (Simon the Just, nke a na-eto nke ukwuu na Ben Sira 50), ọkpara ya Onias nke Atọ, na njide ya. nwa nwoke nke abụọ Jason, onye webatara usoro ihe omume nke Hellenisation nke ezi dugara ná Nnupụisi Maccabean..

Josephus de fo na Onias IV gara Leontopolis na aha ndị Ijipt nke Heliopolis nwere ndị na-eso ya dị egwuregwu ama, na maka ịgbazinye Ptolemaic Fero Propaso agha e nyere ala iji wuo ụlọ nsbọ nke ga-maya Ndị Nsọ dị na Jerusalem (ọ bụ ebe na Josephus ụwa nke a n'aka Onias nke Atọ)., ka ha na-akpa na oru ngo ka a-akpa aro Onias II). Atụwo aro na Onias ma ọ bụ ndị otu ụlọ Zadokaịt ya see ike ịbụ ndị ọchịchị ntọala obodo na Qumran.

Echiche ndị ọzọ gbasara Zedọk

Ụfọdụ ndị ekwuwo na dị ka Zadọk dị n'ihe odide Samuel ruo mgbe e meri Jerusalem, ọ bụ n'ezie onye mgbasa Jebus ji aka n'okpukpe nke mba Izrel . Harvard Divinity School Prọfesọ Frank Moore Cross na-ezo aka na tiori a dị ka "Jebusite Hypothesis", na-akatọ ya nke ukwuu, n'agbanyeghị na ọ chọpụtara ya echiche n'etiti ndị ọkàstar nke oge a. ^[4]

N’ebe ụzo na ụrọ, a ndị iro ndị Jebus n’ụzọ na-egosi na ha fere otu Chineke ahụ ( El Elyon ) dị ka ndị Israel, n’ihe oyiyi Melkizedek . Nkwado ọzọ maka echiche a sitere n'eziokwu ahụ bụ na ndị Jebus ndị ọzọ ma ọ bụ ndị bi na Jerusalem tupu Israel enwee aha ndị na-akpọku ikike ma ọ bụ chi Zedek ( Tzedek ) (lee, dị ka ihe atụ, aha ahụ. bụ́ Melkizedek na Adonizedek). N'okpuru echiche a, usoro nke Erọn nke e nyere Zedọk bụ n'ikpeazụ, njikọ na- Micro isi. ^[5]

Zadok ndị ọzọ

Abraham Geiger, bụ nke echiche na ndị Sadusii ("Tzadoki" na Mishnaic pronunciation) òtù nke ndị Juu wetara aha ha site na Zadọk, na ndị ndú nke otu ahụ bụ aro dị ka ụmụ Zedok. [1] atọ, isi amụ ndị rabaị na-ịhụ otu Sadusii na Boethusian sitere n'otu oge ahụ, ya na ndị ndu ha, Zadok na Boethus, abụọ ha abụọ bụ ụmụ akwụkwọ Antigonus nke Sokho (ihe dị ka àjà nke TOA). ) ^[6]

Rabbi Zadok, otu n’ime tannaim, ka a ụdị aha dị ka atụra na Talmud n’ihe metụtara nke ndị nsọ nke mba.. ^[7]

Ezinụlọ Patrilineal

Dị ka 1 Ihe E Mere isi 5 si dị:Àtụ:Patrilineal descent of the High Priests of Israel

Hụkwa

Zadok Onye Nchụ-aja (ụkwe nsọpụrụ nke George Frideric Handel )
Ndepụta nke ndị isi nchụaja nke Israel
Zadig

Ntụaka

↑ Antiquities of the Jews 7:2, § 2
↑ See "Torath HaKohanim", Mnachem Risikoff, Minor Chap. 200
↑ Robert Alter, The David Story (New York: W. W. Norton, 2000), 15.
↑ See Frank Moore Cross, Canaanite Myth and Hebrew Epic: Essays in the History of the Religion of Israel. Scholars supporting the Jebusite Hypothesis include H. H. Rowley, "Zadok and Nehushtan", Journal of Biblical Literature 58:113–141 (1939); H. H. Rowley, "Melchizedek and Zadok", Festschrift Alfred Bertholet, pp. 461–472 (1950); Rainer Albertz, A History of Israelite Religion in the Old Testament Period 1:295 (1994); and G. H. Jones, The Nathan Narratives 20–25, 40–42, 131–135.
↑ H. H. Rowley, "Zadok and Nehushtan", Journal of Biblical Literature 58:113–141 (1939), states that the Bible provides two different genealogies for Zadok (2 Sam 8:17 and 1 Chron 24:3; see also 1 Chron 5:30–34, 6:35-38), "but of these one is almost certainly due to textual corruption, and the other to the pious fabrication of a later age". Rowley follows this statement with an analysis too long to summarize here.
↑ Avoth deRabbi Nathan 5:2; Maimonides, commentary to Pirkei Avot 1:3
↑ Talmud Bavli Gittin 56b

Àtụ:S-start

Àtụ:S-rel Àtụ:S-bef Àtụ:S-ttl Àtụ:S-aft Àtụ:S-end

[1] Antiquities of the Jews 7:2, § 2

[2] See "Torath HaKohanim", Mnachem Risikoff, Minor Chap. 200

[3] Robert Alter, The David Story (New York: W. W. Norton, 2000), 15.

[4] See Frank Moore Cross, Canaanite Myth and Hebrew Epic: Essays in the History of the Religion of Israel. Scholars supporting the Jebusite Hypothesis include H. H. Rowley, "Zadok and Nehushtan", Journal of Biblical Literature 58:113–141 (1939); H. H. Rowley, "Melchizedek and Zadok", Festschrift Alfred Bertholet, pp. 461–472 (1950); Rainer Albertz, A History of Israelite Religion in the Old Testament Period 1:295 (1994); and G. H. Jones, The Nathan Narratives 20–25, 40–42, 131–135.

[5] H. H. Rowley, "Zadok and Nehushtan", Journal of Biblical Literature 58:113–141 (1939), states that the Bible provides two different genealogies for Zadok (2 Sam 8:17 and 1 Chron 24:3; see also 1 Chron 5:30–34, 6:35-38), "but of these one is almost certainly due to textual corruption, and the other to the pious fabrication of a later age". Rowley follows this statement with an analysis too long to summarize here.

[6] Avoth deRabbi Nathan 5:2; Maimonides, commentary to Pirkei Avot 1:3

[7] Talmud Bavli Gittin 56b

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]